As you readers know, I write continuously about MCNs (multi-channel networks). And, recently, I have been writing about escalating challenges to YouTube. So, where do the "'twain" meet? At the nexus of the overall OTT video lexicon, that's where.
You see, several of the leading digital-first video networks formerly known as "MCNs" no longer answer to that name/acronym. They prefer (justifiably) the new significantly expanded label "MPN" -- as in, multi-platform network.
What's in a name?
In this case, a lot! "MPN" connotes mass distribution of videos across multiple distribution platforms -- not just YouTube. While these mobile/millennial-focused new media companies initially birthed and aggregated their videos as channels on YouTube only (hence, the moniker "multi-channel" networks), now YouTube is only one of many (to be sure, still the most critical "one"). The new MPN game for most is to now initially build mass audiences on YouTube, but then take those audiences -- and monetize them -- off YouTube. That's why these MPNs seek the widest spray of their video programming across the widest array of distribution platforms (including the likes of Facebook, Snapchat, Twitter, Vessel, Xbox -- just to name a few) to create a non-55/45 revenue story. They just can't drive 55! (a musical reference that is likely lost on several of you ...).
Call it simple evolution in the OTT video world. Just like Webster's continuously expands to meet the changing language of the times, the OTT video and digital media/tech dictionary expands to more accurately reflect movement in the overall space.
And, significant meaning in that movement there is ....
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Vessel. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Vessel. Tampilkan semua postingan
Selasa, 31 Maret 2015
Kamis, 05 Maret 2015
LinkedIn Video Coming Soon?
LinkedIn -- everyone's on it -- literally, everyone of us. And, the majority of its traffic is now mobile.
But, it still remains virtually nothing but text.
In this mobile-focused video world, where is LinkedIn in the video conversation? And, why isn't it? (a provocative -- yet little discussed topic -- that came up in my breakfast meeting yesterday).
There's YouTube of course. And, now virtually every video conversation I have with industry insiders includes Facebook (which is seen as YouTube's first real threat). Countless others -- like extremely well-funded upstart Vessel (a company I recently profiled which bills itself as being the Hulu for the mobile/digital-first millennial world) - are also frequently mentioned.
So, why isn't LinkedIn part of this conversation? Why isn't LinkedIn in the video game yet? It is ripe for video not just because all of us are on it. It also is ripe for video not just because most usage is now mobile. It is also ripe -- very -- because many on LinkedIn (especially LinkedIn "Influencers") have massive, passionate audiences who hang on every thought and insight from their individual business "celebs." Imagine if those celebs of the written word evolve into the far more viral video world? Some will effectively make that transition, others will not (in a kind of "Video Killed the Radio Star" kind-of-way). Yes, LinkedIn videos generally would be a different kind of content (i.e., not entertainment first and foremost). But, that too could be a real strength and differentiator. And, that unique-ness could very well be LinkedIn's "special sauce" to advertisers (due to its business-driven/buying-power demographic).
But, while video is not yet part of LinkedIn's story, it inevitably will (and absolutely should and must) be fundamental to it. The company already is killing it (with a market cap of nearly $33 BILLION!). Just imagine when video inevitably enters its lexicon ....
NOW is the time to enter that video conversation. It is a conversation that is moving at auctioneer warp speed ....
[For more LinkedIn "fun facts", check out this article titled "120+ Amazing LinkedIn Statistics" -- a great summary of all.]
But, it still remains virtually nothing but text.
In this mobile-focused video world, where is LinkedIn in the video conversation? And, why isn't it? (a provocative -- yet little discussed topic -- that came up in my breakfast meeting yesterday).
There's YouTube of course. And, now virtually every video conversation I have with industry insiders includes Facebook (which is seen as YouTube's first real threat). Countless others -- like extremely well-funded upstart Vessel (a company I recently profiled which bills itself as being the Hulu for the mobile/digital-first millennial world) - are also frequently mentioned.
So, why isn't LinkedIn part of this conversation? Why isn't LinkedIn in the video game yet? It is ripe for video not just because all of us are on it. It also is ripe for video not just because most usage is now mobile. It is also ripe -- very -- because many on LinkedIn (especially LinkedIn "Influencers") have massive, passionate audiences who hang on every thought and insight from their individual business "celebs." Imagine if those celebs of the written word evolve into the far more viral video world? Some will effectively make that transition, others will not (in a kind of "Video Killed the Radio Star" kind-of-way). Yes, LinkedIn videos generally would be a different kind of content (i.e., not entertainment first and foremost). But, that too could be a real strength and differentiator. And, that unique-ness could very well be LinkedIn's "special sauce" to advertisers (due to its business-driven/buying-power demographic).
But, while video is not yet part of LinkedIn's story, it inevitably will (and absolutely should and must) be fundamental to it. The company already is killing it (with a market cap of nearly $33 BILLION!). Just imagine when video inevitably enters its lexicon ....
NOW is the time to enter that video conversation. It is a conversation that is moving at auctioneer warp speed ....
[For more LinkedIn "fun facts", check out this article titled "120+ Amazing LinkedIn Statistics" -- a great summary of all.]
Sabtu, 21 Februari 2015
My Interview - All About YouTube Challengers (Facebook, Snapchat, Vessel ...) (and Snapchat's $19 Billion "Ask")
StreamDaily recently interviewed me about the state of the overall digital video/streaming landscape -- and YouTube challengers in particular (especially Facebook, Snapchat and Vessel) -- including justification for Snapchat's $19 Billion fundraising "ask." Here it is.
Rabu, 28 Januari 2015
Vessel -- My Review of the New "Alt" YouTube
Vessel -- your single "holder" of all the premium short-form video content you could ever want and need. At least that's the hope for Jason Kilar's new high-profile and heavily-financed ($75M) digital-first video company that set sail in private beta just this past week. With Vessel, Kilar -- Hulu's former CEO -- embarked on creating "the next gen Hulu" -- i.e., premium high-quality short-form digital-first video content optimized for mobile-using millennials. And, even more than that, he and his fellow Love Boat crew want you to happily pay for it -- even if much of that content is freely floating elsewhere in the great virtual sea (okay, enough of the noxious nautical narrative!).
With a form of entrepreneurial alchemy and brash counter-intuity (entrepreneurial qualities that I love), Vessel aims to open windows of 72 hour exclusivity in a digital video world where most others (cue up Netflix) hope to close them. And, Vessel takes aim directly at YouTube and other alternative video platforms (an excellent discussion of which from Digiday can be found here), hoping that creators of compelling video content and who have amassed their own audiences come to them first with a promise of better economics (another excellent discussion of which from VideoInk can be found here).
Will Vessel succeed?
I embarked on my own exploration of that question in Vessel's private beta, and here are my overall observations after wading through the experience in my first days.
I. UI/UX
As expected, first impressions were positive as I first entered (and interacted with) the app -- and, let's face it, first impressions matter. A lot! Set-up and navigation on both my laptop and mobile were as they should be -- simple, intuitive. Once you choose a user name and password, Vessel takes you through a set-up wizard -- a collection of video tiles that represent different content "categories," "channels" and "music artists." You click on those that matter to you -- and that informs Vessel's individualized "vessel" for you. For the most part, I liked the channels that Vessel laid out for me -- as if my own personal butler laid out my clothes for the day (although I found the particular video featured in the main pane to be an odd choice ... begging the question of whether it may be better to feature several videos that are potentially "meaningful" to me rather than take the lower probability route of just choosing one).
Next, the overall UI was clean and "pretty" -- very pretty. No clutter here, which is important. And, the overall user experience (UX) is strong, impressive (a respected press insider dubbed it "amazingly creative" in our own private conversation). Simplicity rules the day (which is ideal for this mobile-focused experience). The core features are all those you would expect -- none that you won't (NOTE: sharing is "disabled" during this private beta; in this regard, it will be interesting to see how share-able exclusive content is from one paying subscriber to non-payers who have yet joined Vessel's journey). The overall mobile nav -- including swiping back and forth between the main menu and the video screen itself -- is remarkably aero-dynamic and downright addictive. That bodes well for user engagement.
Next, Vessel's much-heralded new advertising forms are intriguing. 5-second pre-roll ads flutter by -- unobtrusively and ephemerally (a word?) -- and feel more like 2 seconds that have real visceral impact. Much more compelling and meaningful than "dumbed-down" 30 second ads that are skip-able after 5 seconds (and lose virtually all of their meaning as a result). And then there are the newly minted "motion posters" that float on in Modest Mouse-ian fashion (music lovers will "get" that reference) as you scroll through your videos. Clever. Very. Remember one thing, however, you see these ads even if you become a paid subscriber. Just like at Kilar's former home of Hulu, you pay for early access and content exclusivity -- not for an ad-free experience. Important to know.
All of this worked flawlessly. Downright snappily (another word?) -- even (even in my broadband-challenged home environment).
But, although critical, a compelling beautiful UX is not enough. Other pretty faces exist in the increasingly cut-throat competitive digital-first video world. That requisite beauty and elegance (which Vessel has in spades) must be backed up by substance, depth.
II. CONTENT
And "depth" in this context means a depth of compelling video content. This is especially true here where Vessel's business model and overall differentiation (and value proposition to creators) are tied to exclusivity. (Here again is an excellent deep discussion of Vessel's overall business and pricing model -- which I won't repeat here).
So, is there enough here to justify paying $2.99 per month (especially when much of the content is available elsewhere for free)?
As a threshold matter, no matter what, that will be challenging to many millennials who are dependent upon their parents' credit cards.
But, for others who have a real ability to pay (and there are many of us, even non-millennials like me), Vessel is banking on two things: (1) exclusivity of course (for that 72 hour window); and (2) convenience -- i.e., curation/consolidation/navigation of the video creators/sources/channels you want -- all in one place. Once again, hence the name "Vessel."
To even get to question (2) above, exclusivity is at the crux of Vessel's success or failure. For Vessel to succeed, it must become THE first mobile "home" for must-see premium short-form video content to you (and a critical mass of others) -- much like Netflix is THE home to you for "House of Cards" and "Orange is the New Black," or Amazon with "Transparent," or Showtime with "Homeland," or FX with "Fargo," or HBO with "Game of Thrones," or .... well, you get the point. You need to build it for people to come. Is Vessel there yet with content you can't get anywhere else for a limited period of time? I don't know enough quite yet to make that judgement.
BUT, the fundamental difference for Vessel, as compared to all of those others, is that Vessel's form of exclusivity is transient. So, while its $2.99 monthly subscription fee is a fraction of those of the others (making it almost invisible to your pocket book, in a very Pandora-like way), it remains to be seen whether significant numbers will feel the need for speed -- i.e., 72 hours of early access (rather than much more permanent exclusivity). At least in part, you need hard-core, rabid fans of particular content or personalities to accomplish that mission.
The good thing for Vessel is that in our increasingly niche, verticalized mobile and millennial audience-driven world, rabid fans come in rich supply. So long as the content is compelling, personality-driven and "authentic" (THE key word in the millennial lexicon), you have a shot. And, Vessel's $75 million doesn't hurt. In fact, it was that money that helped Vessel land tent-pole audience-attracting talent like musical comedy duo Rhett & Link (for a reported $500,000) and bleeding-edge content from major multi-channel networks (one deal alone is reported to be $3 million). The company's panache also led to its ability to assemble a "dream team" of advertising partners that impress even industry insiders.
Vessel has set sail with the necessary ingredients -- and then some. It is a luxury liner for sure. And, its early disembarkation is impressive.
Lots of icebergs out there, though.
But isn't that what being innovative and entrepreneurial is all about? After all, there were plenty of nay-sayers when Hulu first launched -- and look at it now.
So, FULL STEAM AHEAD!
[AND CUT my rambling and loquacious nautical imagery ...]
With a form of entrepreneurial alchemy and brash counter-intuity (entrepreneurial qualities that I love), Vessel aims to open windows of 72 hour exclusivity in a digital video world where most others (cue up Netflix) hope to close them. And, Vessel takes aim directly at YouTube and other alternative video platforms (an excellent discussion of which from Digiday can be found here), hoping that creators of compelling video content and who have amassed their own audiences come to them first with a promise of better economics (another excellent discussion of which from VideoInk can be found here).
Will Vessel succeed?
I embarked on my own exploration of that question in Vessel's private beta, and here are my overall observations after wading through the experience in my first days.
I. UI/UX
As expected, first impressions were positive as I first entered (and interacted with) the app -- and, let's face it, first impressions matter. A lot! Set-up and navigation on both my laptop and mobile were as they should be -- simple, intuitive. Once you choose a user name and password, Vessel takes you through a set-up wizard -- a collection of video tiles that represent different content "categories," "channels" and "music artists." You click on those that matter to you -- and that informs Vessel's individualized "vessel" for you. For the most part, I liked the channels that Vessel laid out for me -- as if my own personal butler laid out my clothes for the day (although I found the particular video featured in the main pane to be an odd choice ... begging the question of whether it may be better to feature several videos that are potentially "meaningful" to me rather than take the lower probability route of just choosing one).
Next, the overall UI was clean and "pretty" -- very pretty. No clutter here, which is important. And, the overall user experience (UX) is strong, impressive (a respected press insider dubbed it "amazingly creative" in our own private conversation). Simplicity rules the day (which is ideal for this mobile-focused experience). The core features are all those you would expect -- none that you won't (NOTE: sharing is "disabled" during this private beta; in this regard, it will be interesting to see how share-able exclusive content is from one paying subscriber to non-payers who have yet joined Vessel's journey). The overall mobile nav -- including swiping back and forth between the main menu and the video screen itself -- is remarkably aero-dynamic and downright addictive. That bodes well for user engagement.
Next, Vessel's much-heralded new advertising forms are intriguing. 5-second pre-roll ads flutter by -- unobtrusively and ephemerally (a word?) -- and feel more like 2 seconds that have real visceral impact. Much more compelling and meaningful than "dumbed-down" 30 second ads that are skip-able after 5 seconds (and lose virtually all of their meaning as a result). And then there are the newly minted "motion posters" that float on in Modest Mouse-ian fashion (music lovers will "get" that reference) as you scroll through your videos. Clever. Very. Remember one thing, however, you see these ads even if you become a paid subscriber. Just like at Kilar's former home of Hulu, you pay for early access and content exclusivity -- not for an ad-free experience. Important to know.
All of this worked flawlessly. Downright snappily (another word?) -- even (even in my broadband-challenged home environment).
But, although critical, a compelling beautiful UX is not enough. Other pretty faces exist in the increasingly cut-throat competitive digital-first video world. That requisite beauty and elegance (which Vessel has in spades) must be backed up by substance, depth.
II. CONTENT
And "depth" in this context means a depth of compelling video content. This is especially true here where Vessel's business model and overall differentiation (and value proposition to creators) are tied to exclusivity. (Here again is an excellent deep discussion of Vessel's overall business and pricing model -- which I won't repeat here).
So, is there enough here to justify paying $2.99 per month (especially when much of the content is available elsewhere for free)?
As a threshold matter, no matter what, that will be challenging to many millennials who are dependent upon their parents' credit cards.
But, for others who have a real ability to pay (and there are many of us, even non-millennials like me), Vessel is banking on two things: (1) exclusivity of course (for that 72 hour window); and (2) convenience -- i.e., curation/consolidation/navigation of the video creators/sources/channels you want -- all in one place. Once again, hence the name "Vessel."
To even get to question (2) above, exclusivity is at the crux of Vessel's success or failure. For Vessel to succeed, it must become THE first mobile "home" for must-see premium short-form video content to you (and a critical mass of others) -- much like Netflix is THE home to you for "House of Cards" and "Orange is the New Black," or Amazon with "Transparent," or Showtime with "Homeland," or FX with "Fargo," or HBO with "Game of Thrones," or .... well, you get the point. You need to build it for people to come. Is Vessel there yet with content you can't get anywhere else for a limited period of time? I don't know enough quite yet to make that judgement.
BUT, the fundamental difference for Vessel, as compared to all of those others, is that Vessel's form of exclusivity is transient. So, while its $2.99 monthly subscription fee is a fraction of those of the others (making it almost invisible to your pocket book, in a very Pandora-like way), it remains to be seen whether significant numbers will feel the need for speed -- i.e., 72 hours of early access (rather than much more permanent exclusivity). At least in part, you need hard-core, rabid fans of particular content or personalities to accomplish that mission.
The good thing for Vessel is that in our increasingly niche, verticalized mobile and millennial audience-driven world, rabid fans come in rich supply. So long as the content is compelling, personality-driven and "authentic" (THE key word in the millennial lexicon), you have a shot. And, Vessel's $75 million doesn't hurt. In fact, it was that money that helped Vessel land tent-pole audience-attracting talent like musical comedy duo Rhett & Link (for a reported $500,000) and bleeding-edge content from major multi-channel networks (one deal alone is reported to be $3 million). The company's panache also led to its ability to assemble a "dream team" of advertising partners that impress even industry insiders.
Vessel has set sail with the necessary ingredients -- and then some. It is a luxury liner for sure. And, its early disembarkation is impressive.
Lots of icebergs out there, though.
But isn't that what being innovative and entrepreneurial is all about? After all, there were plenty of nay-sayers when Hulu first launched -- and look at it now.
So, FULL STEAM AHEAD!
[AND CUT my rambling and loquacious nautical imagery ...]
Senin, 22 Desember 2014
Vessel -- The Subscription-First MCN - Opens Windows, While Netflix Closes Them
Jason Kilar’s long-awaited digital-first video service Vessel finally fully opened its sails last week -- charting a course to become the first mass scale paid subscription-first multi-channel network (MCN) -- charging users $2.99 per month.
While most others in the MCN world seek to take down and own individual market verticals (DanceOn for dance, Tastemade for food, Whistle Sports for sports, Stylehaul for fashion), Vessel has no specific focus -- it is broad-based. And, while most other MCNs ultimately hope to build paid subscriptions into their business model, unlike Vessel, they focus first on advertising revenues and branded content. THAT is a fundamental difference. Interestingly, some other leading MCNs (including DanceOn and Tastemade) apparently already have committed to distribute at least some of their content exclusively on Vessel’s platform for 72 hours (a new 3 day “window”). Why would they do this? Several reasons: (1) Vessel will pay them and certain other coveted video creators for such exclusivity; (2) Vessel also will share 60% of relevant subscription revenues on top of that; and (3) Vessel’s subscription focus will accelerate their own paid subscription ambitions. This is significantly different than what has been reported previously on the issue of 72-hour exclusivity.
Essentially, Vessel’s goal is to turn water into wine with a bit of compelling digital-first video content consolidation alchemy -- transforming here-to-date mostly free digital content into paid content. In so doing, Vessel is opening a 72 hour paid window in this digital-first short form video YouTube-ian world, while Netflix and others seek to close them for long-form “traditional” motion picture content.
One window closes. Another one opens. Will opportunity, in the form of meaningful monetization, flow in? Or, will there be nothing but air? Only time will tell, but all digital-first content creators are holding their breath with anticipation for Vessel’s official launch in 2015.
While most others in the MCN world seek to take down and own individual market verticals (DanceOn for dance, Tastemade for food, Whistle Sports for sports, Stylehaul for fashion), Vessel has no specific focus -- it is broad-based. And, while most other MCNs ultimately hope to build paid subscriptions into their business model, unlike Vessel, they focus first on advertising revenues and branded content. THAT is a fundamental difference. Interestingly, some other leading MCNs (including DanceOn and Tastemade) apparently already have committed to distribute at least some of their content exclusively on Vessel’s platform for 72 hours (a new 3 day “window”). Why would they do this? Several reasons: (1) Vessel will pay them and certain other coveted video creators for such exclusivity; (2) Vessel also will share 60% of relevant subscription revenues on top of that; and (3) Vessel’s subscription focus will accelerate their own paid subscription ambitions. This is significantly different than what has been reported previously on the issue of 72-hour exclusivity.
Essentially, Vessel’s goal is to turn water into wine with a bit of compelling digital-first video content consolidation alchemy -- transforming here-to-date mostly free digital content into paid content. In so doing, Vessel is opening a 72 hour paid window in this digital-first short form video YouTube-ian world, while Netflix and others seek to close them for long-form “traditional” motion picture content.
One window closes. Another one opens. Will opportunity, in the form of meaningful monetization, flow in? Or, will there be nothing but air? Only time will tell, but all digital-first content creators are holding their breath with anticipation for Vessel’s official launch in 2015.
Kamis, 09 Oktober 2014
ESPN, the New YouTube for Brands? Welcome to The Age of Lifestyle Media Companies
ESPN is not just for us couch potatoes anymore. It is now a home for those selling those very potatoes from which the chips-we-eat-as-we-watch are made -- i.e., major consumer brands. Huh? What?
Here’s the story. ESPN just announced -- nay, invited -- major brands to develop programming for their distribution platform, initially focusing on its TV Everywhere app. Not commercials. Not ads. Not traditional sponsorships. Actual entertainment programming. Engaging video. Case in point -- major media company, Dick’s Sporting Goods (well, perhaps not “major” yet, but possibly with major aspirations to become one some day -- Marriott anyone?) developed the documentary series “Hell Week” for ESPN.
Pause and chew on that for a moment. Dick’s didn’t go to YouTube first with its videos -- historically, the standard path for brand-backed videos. It went to ESPN first. And, it paid ESPN for that privilege. That is precisely ESPN’s goal -- to become the first choice for major brands to produce original, differentiated and compelling programming for its audience. Outside the YouTube ecosystem. And, here’s the beauty of it -- not only does ESPN get compelling (hopefully) new programming developed on someone else’s dime, they also get paid by that content creator (in this case, Dick’s) for that privilege AND ... wait for it ... ESPN also gets to run their traditional ads against that programming which pay yet again. That is some Trifecta! Kudos to you ESPN!
Here’s the story. ESPN just announced -- nay, invited -- major brands to develop programming for their distribution platform, initially focusing on its TV Everywhere app. Not commercials. Not ads. Not traditional sponsorships. Actual entertainment programming. Engaging video. Case in point -- major media company, Dick’s Sporting Goods (well, perhaps not “major” yet, but possibly with major aspirations to become one some day -- Marriott anyone?) developed the documentary series “Hell Week” for ESPN.Pause and chew on that for a moment. Dick’s didn’t go to YouTube first with its videos -- historically, the standard path for brand-backed videos. It went to ESPN first. And, it paid ESPN for that privilege. That is precisely ESPN’s goal -- to become the first choice for major brands to produce original, differentiated and compelling programming for its audience. Outside the YouTube ecosystem. And, here’s the beauty of it -- not only does ESPN get compelling (hopefully) new programming developed on someone else’s dime, they also get paid by that content creator (in this case, Dick’s) for that privilege AND ... wait for it ... ESPN also gets to run their traditional ads against that programming which pay yet again. That is some Trifecta! Kudos to you ESPN!
ESPN is not alone in its goal of being “the first choice” over YouTube for video creators, including brands. This “divorce” from YouTube -- perhaps not a complete divorce, but at least a trial separation -- is a persistent theme in digital media circles these days. Content creators of all stripes increasingly loudly express dismay (that’s a soft way of putting it for some) over YouTube’s 55/45 revenue split to creators. The result is a burgeoning number of YouTube alternative platforms that promise better times for those video creators who enter their world first. Think big OTT guns like Netflix and Amazon. Think old stalwarts like Yahoo!, Comcast and Xbox. Think major MCNs like Disney-fied Maker Studios, Otter-ized Fullscreen and hot young MCN Whistle Sports (which bills itself as a new kind of ESPN for millennials). And, think newbies like Vessel and Zealot Networks. Something is most definitely in the air ... on the air? Yes, in more places than ever before. High times indeed for the creative community.
Which brings us back to Dick’s. Dick’s is not alone. Marriott, as glibly noted above, just recently busted a move (reference, too dated?). Pepsi just made major “noises” to that effect. Starbuck’s. And an increasing list of “others” all trying to pull a Red Bull and smartly transform themselves into lifestyle media companies that are significantly more interesting -- and engaging -- to consumers (especially to the coveted mobile-savvy millennial).
In any event, ESPN’s bold move is not to be denied. Or overlooked. It is yet another major data point demonstrating that brands increasingly see (or strategically want others to see) themselves as becoming media companies. My business team and I at Manatt Digital Media see this directly. We have already guided brands in this kind of media morphology. We just recently finished a media transformation engagement for a respected beauty brand.
This is real. It is not fashion or fad. And it is accelerating ...
Brands -- grab your lifestyles now while they last! And, become storytellers, not just marketeers ...
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)




