Apple's September 9 mega-press event is fast approaching -- and the rumor mill and pundit speculation are at a fever pitch. I certainly have entered the fray in separate interviews in the New York Times and Los Angeles Times, etc.
One central theme in all of this pre-event hype is Apple's inevitable launch of its own Netflix-like subscription streaming video service -- will (or won't) it happen on Wednesday? I just published my own Apple v. Netflix 5-factor analysis in a head-to-head showdown when it does -- and, my headline was, "Maybe Apple Should Just Buy Netflix."
But, here's the thing -- Apple won't buy Netflix. But, Apple may buy Hulu (and it wouldn't be beyond the pale that Apple announces that on Wednesday).
Here are 5 reasons why an Apple/Hulu mega-deal would make sense -- and why Apple's not-too-distant acquisition of Beats on the music side is both consistent and highly instructive on this tantalizing possibility:
(1) Hulu gives Apple the immediate mass of content (and related rights) it needs. It is no secret that Apple has been challenged in its content negotiations with studios and broadcasters for the streaming rights it need (just like it was on the music side). That has delayed Apple's "Netflix Killer" over and over again. Hulu (like Beats Music) would solve that problem immediately at mass scale.
(2) Hulu gives Apple the immediate marquee differentiating content it needs. Hulu has been on bender lately buying up exclusive premium marquee video content and television rights at significant price-tags. Cases in point include South Park ($192 million for 5 years), Seinfeld ($160 million for 5 years), and last week's coup of stealing away Epix cable movie rights from Netflix. A new boldness at Hulu is in the air -- highly differentiated from its appetite in the past. Was this all simply part of plan to better position itself to Apple (and potential other mega-buyers)? Certainly, Hulu has actively flirted with the idea of being acquired for several years now (that has been big news in Hollywood for years). This may be the time. Previously, those who woo-d Hulu (including Yahoo! and several media behemoths) didn't step up to the plate to meet the bold demands of Hulu's media owners (Disney, Fox and NBCUniversal). Apple, with its mega-$200 million cash hoard certainly is in a position to be significantly more aggressive. It certainly was with Beats -- spending a cool $3 billion (which is significantly more than any purported Hulu offers previously).
(3) Hulu gives Apple the immediate core creative and production expertise it needs for its inevitable "Originals" strategy. The buzz about Hollywood this past week centered around Apple's reported newly-rejuvinated plans to develop its own premium original movies and series a la HBO, Netflix, Amazon ... and Hulu. I was interviewed this past week over and over again about this captivating rumor, underscoring how critical and fundamental an effective originals programming strategy is to differentiate any one service from the growing field of mega streaming competitors. Hulu -- which already features a deep slate of original programming -- has those chops (and the relationships that go with them). Let's not forget -- Apple still is first and foremost a technology company -- it critically needs that Hollywood expertise and those authentic relationships with the creative community. Hulu immediately solves that problem (just like Beats did on the music side with Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre -- critical creative and relationship elements to that deal). Apple should (and likely will) augment that expertise further by buying an innovative, connected premium marquee production house (and the talent that goes with it) in an effort to "out-marquee" all others.
(4) Hulu gives Apple an immediate widely-recognized video brand and immediate mass distribution. Yes, everyone knows (and uses) Netflix. But, everyone also knows Hulu. It is a widely-known -- and increasingly widely-respected -- brand (especially now as more and more exclusive compelling premium content is available on its platform). Hulu also -- importantly -- already is featured on most significant non-Apple distribution platforms. Yes, I know, Apple dropped the Beats brand when it recast that music streaming service as Apple Music. But, remember, Beats Music had launched only months before Apple's acquisition (and didn't yet build its own significant user base yet and the "goodwill" associated with it). And, let's also not forget that Apple DID retain the Beats brand for headphones -- its established business that had built up a significant customer base and goodwill. So, it certainly is no longer unprecedented for Apple to feature a different brand name. Hulu's brand is fundamentally different from the Beats Music service brand. It is an established premium video brand, as well as a respected video service with mass scale, goodwill and a generally applauded customer experience (an Apple hallmark). Hulu's "Swiss" non-Apple brand is beneficial to further expand the service beyond the Apple platform. And then, of course -- in the big inevitable shot across the bow to Netflix -- Hulu (in the hands of Apple) would also be the headline primary featured service on Apple TV and in the overall closed Apple eco-system. Others may still exist on that platform (as they do now), but they would be buried into relative obscurity. You can be sure of that. Membership has its privileges -- and Apple controls what we see on its platform (and in its retail stores). That, of course, significantly impacts what service we use (and the switching costs from Netflix to Apple are minimal in this subscription streaming game). Compelling.
(5) Hulu gives Apple a significantly more cost-effective way to enter the streaming video market at mass scale. Yes, Apple could afford to buy Netflix (as I pointed out in my recent blog post). But, Hulu would be massively more cost-effective (by a significant multiple). Again, Apple's Beats deal is highly instructive in this regard. Apple could have easily bought the market mega-leader in the streaming music space -- i.e., Spotify. But, that move would likely have carried a $10-$15 billion price-tag (since Spotify's last round valued the company at $8+ billion). Instead, Apple paid $3 billion for Beats (and got the lucrative headphone business to go with it). Apple likely could buy Hulu for something more in the $4-$6 billion range (previous reported Hulu M&A discussions indicated that a $2 billion-ish price likely would have closed the deal). Netflix, which trades at around a $42 billion market cap (as of this past Friday), likely would cost $60-$80 billion. And, although Apple holds $200 billion in cash, that massive differential (between Hulu and Netflix) matters -- especially if Apple gets many of the ingredients it needs via Hulu. Apple also could sweeten the pot to further entice Hulu's owners (i.e., the studios) to consent to the transfer of Hulu's content licenses to Apple by giving them some equity in the newly-acquired company to give them a piece of the action -- and to make Hollywood a bit more amenable to licensing its content to Hulu as a result in the future. Again, membership has its privileges.
So, will Tim Cook announce a Hulu deal on Wednesday? I absolutely believe he will make some kind of major strategic video content announcement as part of his Apple TV "main event." But, I peg odds of this intriguing Hulu possibility as being small ... for now.
However, that doesn't mean it's not a logical move. Nor does that mean that it won't eventually happen. Apple understands it needs to enter the streaming video service game now in a big, big way. There is no time to wait any longer. Netflix has simply gotten too big, too fast. It ultimately saw the same writing on the wall on the music side. Spotify had simply gotten too big, too fast. So, Apple finally made is long overdue move with Beats.
Apple will make a massive move on the video side too. That is inevitable. Hulu could be that move. And, when it does, its vastly different (and significantly more compelling) underlying business model from Netflix's will be a significant advantage (see point 5 in my recent blog post which discusses that oft-overlooked point).
Ladies and gentlemen, buckle your seat belts. It's going to be a bumpy ride.
But, an incredibly dramatic and exciting one as well ....
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Apple TV. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Apple TV. Tampilkan semua postingan
Minggu, 06 September 2015
Jumat, 05 Juni 2015
Rabu, 03 Juni 2015
USA TODAY's Jefferson Graham - My EXCLUSIVE Audio Interview (The "Next Big Thing" In Tech)
Yesterday, USA Today's long-time lead tech reporter, Jefferson Graham, interviewed me about all things Apple in advance of next week's WWDC -- iTunes Music, Apple TV, iOS 9 (here is the link to his interview). Following my interview, I bumped into him at a local Greek Restaurant -- and turned the tables on him. This is my interview of Jefferson about how USA Today's historical print business -- and his professional life -- have been fundamentally transformed by the mobile-driven digital transformation of media and entertainment about which I continuously write. All tech and digital media roads lead to Jefferson. So, his candid insights are worth listening to (despite our occasional chewing ...) -- including what he calls the most exciting thing in tech right now. Listen on ....
Selasa, 02 Juni 2015
Apple Watch! WWDC Preview & Predictions, That Is ...
Apple Watch! No, not the Watch itself -- but rather "watch" as in your local station's "Storm Watch" (anytime a drop of rain is expected) -- as in my preview of (and predictions for) Apple's upcoming World-Wide Developers Conference (WWDC) next week. All eyes in the business world will obsessively fixate on San Francisco once again, as Tim Cook kicks off on June 8th what everyone hopes to be "the next big thing" in our increasingly tech-hungry lives.
So, will it be the kind of "big thing" that will excite the Apple flock? And, if so, what will "IT" be? (I discuss that question with USA TODAY's Jefferson Graham later today on his video show -- and then, once again, Thursday night LIVE at 5 pm Pacific/8 pm Eastern on his "Talking Tech" radio show via TuneIn Radio).
Four big buckets of announcements are expected -- (1) Apple Watch, (2) iTunes Music, (3) Apple TV, and (4) iOS9.
(1) APPLE WATCH -- No big surprises here. Tim Cook will update us all on the expected massive initial numbers for Apple's latest product expansion (and also impress us all with the increasing number of native apps that require no iPhone link). (I just got mine shipped this past week and am wearing it now for the first time as I write this -- that is mine in the picture above -- NOTE to Cupertino: I tried to change the time to 6:08 to make it more relevant to Tim Cook's June 8th keynote, but the settings weren't very intuitive).
(2) ITUNES MUSIC -- Apple bought Beats last year for $3 billion for a reason -- and, this reason finally comes to light next week when Apple announces its new "Spotify Killer" $10/month subscription service. No ad-free alternative here -- it's all-or-nothing with this new service (although a limited free trial period is expected). So, what is Apple's "special sauce" to make a dent in the Spotify machine? Actually, the Apple core has a good story to tell here.
First -- the Apple juggernaut is just that ... a juggernaut. It is a marketing machine -- with both online and offline (retail) channels. Spotify can't compete with that. If Apple wants to make a dent, it can by its sheer heft. It can simply throw gazillions of dollars at the problem/opportunity. There is nothing else like it. That's the beauty of being the most valuable company in the world. Short-term losses are no problem if they lead to long-term success. And, Apple's tantalizing prospect is to convert a significant portion of its 110 million iTunes users (who spend an average of $30/year) to a subscription model (yielding $120/year instead). Which leads me to my next point ...
... Second, unlike Spotify, Apple's iTunes subscription service can be a success even if it loses money because, ultimately, it functions as marketing for Apple hardware (iPhones, Apple Watches, etc.) (Here's my separate relevant discussion/analysis in the context of Apple v. Netflix of why this is the case). Spotify doesn't have that luxury. Spotify must make money from the service itself -- and, that hasn't happened yet (no matter how massive it is -- with 86% of the U.S. on demand streaming market, 15 million paying subs worldwide, and $1 billion annual revenues).
Third -- and more important than most people think -- unlike Spotify, Apple takes great strides to portray itself as being creator and artist-friendly -- and that matters. Spotify proudly trumpets its emotion-free tech-first heritage -- and has lost some allies along the way because of it (Taylor Swift, anyone?). But, emotional appeal matters -- because humans (especially artists!) are emotional. Apple's fearless leader Steve Jobs set the tone in this regard by smartly placing artists first in his initial iTunes/iPod marketing (which was natural, since he was very much an artist himself). And Apple's Tim Cook stayed true to this DNA when he bought Beats in significant part to bring Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre into the fold (and, consequently, all of those other artists who respect them). By doing that, Cook bought numerous allies that can help him shape a differentiated user/listener experience. Listen closely next week. That artist savvy will permeate discussion and functionality of the new service (with significant impacts to Pandora as well).
(3) APPLE TV -- everyone expects Apple TV to get a major face-lift next week (clues in this regard were obvious in the WWDC invitation itself), but how "major" will that face-lift be? Will "IT" simply be "a better little square box" -- or will it be the long-anticipated full-fledged all-in-one beautiful flat-screen iTV? As much as I would like to say the latter, I don't expect it ... yet (although that day will come). But, the Apple TV "hobby" we know and love (at least some) will have more power ... including new features like Siri integration and initial hints to home automation ... and, most significantly, may even come with its own new OTT streaming service (aka "Netflix Killer"). Apple has long faced major hurdles with studios and broadcasters to license a critical mass of content -- and those challenges continue -- so it's not certain that Cook will yet announce the on-demand streaming video service. But, I think he will. Cupertino lawyers are feverishly trying to ink those final deals right now -- and they can be persuasive (after all, Apple's war chest doesn't hurt).
But, once Apple does launch its inevitable OTT video service, can it make a dent in the Netflix machine?
I absolutely think it can -- and for many of the same reasons that apply in the music/Spotify discussion above. In fact, I previously wrote about Apple v. Netflix at length -- analyzing the threat Apple poses to the market leader. Definitely worthy of a read (as self-promotional as that sounds). And, don't forget, Apple's inevitable OTT video service will feature both VOD and live linear TV (including ESPN). Netflix certainly doesn't have that.
(4) iOS 9 -- Virtually everyone expects new iOS 9 to be announced next week -- which makes sense since it is a developers conference after all. Yes, this ain't the sexy stuff, but it is still "stuff" that matters to us all -- because the OS defines our individual user experiences.
Any major "gasp"-worthy new functionality in iOS 9? Not really (although there is some chatter about some early Augmented Reality (AR) functionality) -- which follows Apple's recent purchase of AR company Metaio. Performance will be optimized -- and some "nice to haves" that many others have already discussed. But, it's always nice to get new features.
So, will it be the kind of "big thing" that will excite the Apple flock? And, if so, what will "IT" be? (I discuss that question with USA TODAY's Jefferson Graham later today on his video show -- and then, once again, Thursday night LIVE at 5 pm Pacific/8 pm Eastern on his "Talking Tech" radio show via TuneIn Radio).
Four big buckets of announcements are expected -- (1) Apple Watch, (2) iTunes Music, (3) Apple TV, and (4) iOS9.
(1) APPLE WATCH -- No big surprises here. Tim Cook will update us all on the expected massive initial numbers for Apple's latest product expansion (and also impress us all with the increasing number of native apps that require no iPhone link). (I just got mine shipped this past week and am wearing it now for the first time as I write this -- that is mine in the picture above -- NOTE to Cupertino: I tried to change the time to 6:08 to make it more relevant to Tim Cook's June 8th keynote, but the settings weren't very intuitive).
(2) ITUNES MUSIC -- Apple bought Beats last year for $3 billion for a reason -- and, this reason finally comes to light next week when Apple announces its new "Spotify Killer" $10/month subscription service. No ad-free alternative here -- it's all-or-nothing with this new service (although a limited free trial period is expected). So, what is Apple's "special sauce" to make a dent in the Spotify machine? Actually, the Apple core has a good story to tell here.
First -- the Apple juggernaut is just that ... a juggernaut. It is a marketing machine -- with both online and offline (retail) channels. Spotify can't compete with that. If Apple wants to make a dent, it can by its sheer heft. It can simply throw gazillions of dollars at the problem/opportunity. There is nothing else like it. That's the beauty of being the most valuable company in the world. Short-term losses are no problem if they lead to long-term success. And, Apple's tantalizing prospect is to convert a significant portion of its 110 million iTunes users (who spend an average of $30/year) to a subscription model (yielding $120/year instead). Which leads me to my next point ...
... Second, unlike Spotify, Apple's iTunes subscription service can be a success even if it loses money because, ultimately, it functions as marketing for Apple hardware (iPhones, Apple Watches, etc.) (Here's my separate relevant discussion/analysis in the context of Apple v. Netflix of why this is the case). Spotify doesn't have that luxury. Spotify must make money from the service itself -- and, that hasn't happened yet (no matter how massive it is -- with 86% of the U.S. on demand streaming market, 15 million paying subs worldwide, and $1 billion annual revenues).
Third -- and more important than most people think -- unlike Spotify, Apple takes great strides to portray itself as being creator and artist-friendly -- and that matters. Spotify proudly trumpets its emotion-free tech-first heritage -- and has lost some allies along the way because of it (Taylor Swift, anyone?). But, emotional appeal matters -- because humans (especially artists!) are emotional. Apple's fearless leader Steve Jobs set the tone in this regard by smartly placing artists first in his initial iTunes/iPod marketing (which was natural, since he was very much an artist himself). And Apple's Tim Cook stayed true to this DNA when he bought Beats in significant part to bring Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre into the fold (and, consequently, all of those other artists who respect them). By doing that, Cook bought numerous allies that can help him shape a differentiated user/listener experience. Listen closely next week. That artist savvy will permeate discussion and functionality of the new service (with significant impacts to Pandora as well).
(3) APPLE TV -- everyone expects Apple TV to get a major face-lift next week (clues in this regard were obvious in the WWDC invitation itself), but how "major" will that face-lift be? Will "IT" simply be "a better little square box" -- or will it be the long-anticipated full-fledged all-in-one beautiful flat-screen iTV? As much as I would like to say the latter, I don't expect it ... yet (although that day will come). But, the Apple TV "hobby" we know and love (at least some) will have more power ... including new features like Siri integration and initial hints to home automation ... and, most significantly, may even come with its own new OTT streaming service (aka "Netflix Killer"). Apple has long faced major hurdles with studios and broadcasters to license a critical mass of content -- and those challenges continue -- so it's not certain that Cook will yet announce the on-demand streaming video service. But, I think he will. Cupertino lawyers are feverishly trying to ink those final deals right now -- and they can be persuasive (after all, Apple's war chest doesn't hurt).
But, once Apple does launch its inevitable OTT video service, can it make a dent in the Netflix machine?
I absolutely think it can -- and for many of the same reasons that apply in the music/Spotify discussion above. In fact, I previously wrote about Apple v. Netflix at length -- analyzing the threat Apple poses to the market leader. Definitely worthy of a read (as self-promotional as that sounds). And, don't forget, Apple's inevitable OTT video service will feature both VOD and live linear TV (including ESPN). Netflix certainly doesn't have that.
(4) iOS 9 -- Virtually everyone expects new iOS 9 to be announced next week -- which makes sense since it is a developers conference after all. Yes, this ain't the sexy stuff, but it is still "stuff" that matters to us all -- because the OS defines our individual user experiences.
Any major "gasp"-worthy new functionality in iOS 9? Not really (although there is some chatter about some early Augmented Reality (AR) functionality) -- which follows Apple's recent purchase of AR company Metaio. Performance will be optimized -- and some "nice to haves" that many others have already discussed. But, it's always nice to get new features.
Rabu, 25 Maret 2015
Tastemade - Scenes From the MCN's Exclusive Event
Last night, leading food & travel MCN Tastemade (headquartered just down the street from us here at Manatt Digital Media in Santa Monica, CA) held an exclusive invite-only event announcing its new partnership with Apple TV (a big coup which gives the MCN great visibility and distribution). As expected, great food. Great drink. And video creators all around. Here are some images of the event. (Below, in order of appearance top to bottom, (i) deconstructing steak with a blow-torch ... yes, a blow-torch), (ii) the overall scene in the Tastemade studios, and (iii) pouring home-made Old Fashions.

Minggu, 22 Maret 2015
Apple's iTV With Rollable Display This Fall? 4 Tantalizing Clues ...
5 years ago I was one of the first to predict that Apple would invade your living room in the form of an all-in-one beautiful, integrated "iTV" -- which is definitely NOT the Apple TV you know (and 25 million of you love) today. It would be the real deal.
Yes, I was early (way early!) - but, content was always the problem (not the hardware/tech) and timing is finally right for this to happen later this year (just in time for the Xmas season). Several things lead me to this conclusion:
(1) Apple's "hallmark" is seamlessly marrying compelling software/services with beautiful hardware, with the effect being to create what the Apple faithful consider to be the best customer experiences out there. That's why the Apple brand means so much. So, as I have always written, Apple could not enter the real iTV game without first having the compelling content package (including live/linear TV like ESPN and HBO) necessary to pull that kind of user experience off.
Well, now it appears that Apple may have finally cracked that inhibiting code -- with rumors abounding that Apple's "Netflix-Killer" will launch this fall (here's my separate 5-reason analysis why Apple's OTT video service will be a smash hit at launch). As soon as I heard that news, I immediately concluded in my own mind the next logical step -- time was right for the iTV to finally see the light of day.
(2) Giving more credence to me, I was told by a credible source (who, in turn, heard from a credible source -- yes, I concede this is indirect) that the iTV is being manufactured right now and will feature a rollable display -- which truly would revolutionize the mass-market "TV" business. And, Apple generally doesn't release anything -- especially when it is as late as it is here in this TV game -- unless it believes it has a marketing story that is untouchable. And this "hardware as software" headline would be pretty damn good:
THE NEW PORTABLE "ANYWHERE" ITV, WITH ROLLABLE DISPLAY, ESPN & HBO
(3) Steve Jobs always called the current Apple TV a "hobby" -- implying that it was only the prequel to the main event. And, Walter Isaacson's authorized biography of Steve Jobs' put an exclamation on this point, underscoring, in Jobs' own words, that he absolutely was going there to build a full-fledged integrated "TV":
“I’d like to create an integrated television set that is completely easy to use ... It would be seamlessly synced with all of your devices and with iCloud. No longer would users have to fiddle with complex remotes for DVD players and cable channels. It will have the simplest user interface you could imagine. I finally cracked it."
(4) And, finally, at Apple's latest major press event a few weeks back, CEO Tim Cook expressly teased about even more compelling things to come later this year -- and he wasn't talking about the Apple Watch. And, it makes sense to me that he drops the price of the current "hobby" Apple TV by $30 in advance of the main event -- think of it as being the Nano-ization of the TV ecosystem. You have a mass market, extremely inexpensive Nano-ized Apple TV (the current one) -- and then you have the fully-featured, fully-priced iPod-like iTV (the coming one).
Yes, the television game is one of historical low margins. But, if Apple has demonstrated anything, it is that consumers are willing to pay significantly higher prices (with significantly higher margins) for its products. The mass market PC (v. Mac) is one prime example. And, don't forget this additional critical piece -- an iTV with an integrated OTT streaming service gives Apple immediate access to a treasure trove of our personal data (viewing habits, etc.) that, in turn, offers the potential to accelerate sales of all Apple products (not just iTVs). In other words, it could be a powerful driver of the entire Apple eco-system.
If true, is Apple done dominating our world wherever we are? Where else can the Cupertino crew take us in its quest for hardware world domination?
On the road, naturally.
Apple's iCar -- Apple buying Tesla -- something I first speculated (and analyzed the logic of) nearly two years ago (well before those rumors abounded).
Yes, I was early (way early!) - but, content was always the problem (not the hardware/tech) and timing is finally right for this to happen later this year (just in time for the Xmas season). Several things lead me to this conclusion:
(1) Apple's "hallmark" is seamlessly marrying compelling software/services with beautiful hardware, with the effect being to create what the Apple faithful consider to be the best customer experiences out there. That's why the Apple brand means so much. So, as I have always written, Apple could not enter the real iTV game without first having the compelling content package (including live/linear TV like ESPN and HBO) necessary to pull that kind of user experience off.
Well, now it appears that Apple may have finally cracked that inhibiting code -- with rumors abounding that Apple's "Netflix-Killer" will launch this fall (here's my separate 5-reason analysis why Apple's OTT video service will be a smash hit at launch). As soon as I heard that news, I immediately concluded in my own mind the next logical step -- time was right for the iTV to finally see the light of day.
(2) Giving more credence to me, I was told by a credible source (who, in turn, heard from a credible source -- yes, I concede this is indirect) that the iTV is being manufactured right now and will feature a rollable display -- which truly would revolutionize the mass-market "TV" business. And, Apple generally doesn't release anything -- especially when it is as late as it is here in this TV game -- unless it believes it has a marketing story that is untouchable. And this "hardware as software" headline would be pretty damn good:
THE NEW PORTABLE "ANYWHERE" ITV, WITH ROLLABLE DISPLAY, ESPN & HBO
(3) Steve Jobs always called the current Apple TV a "hobby" -- implying that it was only the prequel to the main event. And, Walter Isaacson's authorized biography of Steve Jobs' put an exclamation on this point, underscoring, in Jobs' own words, that he absolutely was going there to build a full-fledged integrated "TV":
“I’d like to create an integrated television set that is completely easy to use ... It would be seamlessly synced with all of your devices and with iCloud. No longer would users have to fiddle with complex remotes for DVD players and cable channels. It will have the simplest user interface you could imagine. I finally cracked it."
(4) And, finally, at Apple's latest major press event a few weeks back, CEO Tim Cook expressly teased about even more compelling things to come later this year -- and he wasn't talking about the Apple Watch. And, it makes sense to me that he drops the price of the current "hobby" Apple TV by $30 in advance of the main event -- think of it as being the Nano-ization of the TV ecosystem. You have a mass market, extremely inexpensive Nano-ized Apple TV (the current one) -- and then you have the fully-featured, fully-priced iPod-like iTV (the coming one).
Yes, the television game is one of historical low margins. But, if Apple has demonstrated anything, it is that consumers are willing to pay significantly higher prices (with significantly higher margins) for its products. The mass market PC (v. Mac) is one prime example. And, don't forget this additional critical piece -- an iTV with an integrated OTT streaming service gives Apple immediate access to a treasure trove of our personal data (viewing habits, etc.) that, in turn, offers the potential to accelerate sales of all Apple products (not just iTVs). In other words, it could be a powerful driver of the entire Apple eco-system.
If true, is Apple done dominating our world wherever we are? Where else can the Cupertino crew take us in its quest for hardware world domination?
On the road, naturally.
Apple's iCar -- Apple buying Tesla -- something I first speculated (and analyzed the logic of) nearly two years ago (well before those rumors abounded).
Rabu, 18 Maret 2015
5 Reasons Apple's Netflix-Killer Will Be a Smash Hit
The worst-kept secret is very much alive again -- i.e., Apple hopes to launch its long-anticipated (overdue?) OTT video service by fall. To be clear -- with Apple, it has always been a question of "when," not "if" (I wrote about this about one month ago in a detailed overview of the entire OTT space).
Here are 5 reasons Apple's "Netflix killer" will be a massive hit when the inevitable becomes reality:
(1) It's Apple! That's all many of you need to know. You will immediately sign up in droves just like you line up in droves anytime Apple launches a new hardware product. No product reviews are necessary for you. You just trust that it will be good. It's downright Pavlov-ian -- you can't help yourselves.
(2) Many of you will ditch Netflix. Yes, you and the rest of the planet already have Netflix subscriptions. But, unlike Netflix, Apple will offer both VOD AND live/linear TV (Netflix's Achilles heel). And, switching costs are low (essentially non-existent -- with two important caveats below). All you need to do is go online and cancel. That's the beauty of Netflix and other non-linear TV OTT services for you. (But, that's certainly not beautiful for Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu. That's a real problem that can be countered only with two things: (i) content -- both (a) kick-ass original content like House of Cards, and (b) content depth that Apple will not have for a long time; and (ii) price -- Netflix's price will be lower (although Apple can do what Netflix can't -- subsidize content licensing costs via hardware sales -- a fundamentally different business model)).
(3) Millions of you already have Apple TV's. That means one software upgrade and BAM!, you got your iTV! Netflix doesn't have that seamless "hardware/software" advantage (an Apple hallmark). Of course Apple will place its new OTT video service front and center and give it to you for free (for several months). The user experience will be compelling. You will try it! And, then you will let your credit card auto-renew.
(4) Millions more will buy new Apple TV's. Heck, those crafty Cupertino-ians are practically giving them away now -- dropping the price to $69. That's just two weeks of Starbuck lattes! (And here's a tantalizing thought. What if Apple's New "Netflix killer" is just the app-e-teaser for the main event -- its launch of the long-anticipated all-in-one real iTV -- something about which I first wrote 5 years ago? 'Tis a real possibility. After all, Steve Jobs always called the current little Apple TV black box a "hobby." This could be time for the real thing).
(5) It will feature ESPN and HBO. This is the programming 1-2 punch. Apple TV already is alone with HBO's new stand-alone HBO Now service (a 90 day exclusive). And, Dish's Sling TV already cracked the code with ESPN, so the door is wide open for Apple so long as it pays just like the other Pay TV guys (which it absolutely will for ESPN, the most necessary programming ingredient). Netflix, of course, doesn't have either. (One more little detail -- don't forget that ESPN is owned by Disney, and Disney's Chairman & CEO Bob Iger sits on Apple's board.)
Apple's "Netflix killer" -- it came, we saw, they conquered!
Here are 5 reasons Apple's "Netflix killer" will be a massive hit when the inevitable becomes reality:
(1) It's Apple! That's all many of you need to know. You will immediately sign up in droves just like you line up in droves anytime Apple launches a new hardware product. No product reviews are necessary for you. You just trust that it will be good. It's downright Pavlov-ian -- you can't help yourselves.
(2) Many of you will ditch Netflix. Yes, you and the rest of the planet already have Netflix subscriptions. But, unlike Netflix, Apple will offer both VOD AND live/linear TV (Netflix's Achilles heel). And, switching costs are low (essentially non-existent -- with two important caveats below). All you need to do is go online and cancel. That's the beauty of Netflix and other non-linear TV OTT services for you. (But, that's certainly not beautiful for Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Hulu. That's a real problem that can be countered only with two things: (i) content -- both (a) kick-ass original content like House of Cards, and (b) content depth that Apple will not have for a long time; and (ii) price -- Netflix's price will be lower (although Apple can do what Netflix can't -- subsidize content licensing costs via hardware sales -- a fundamentally different business model)).
(3) Millions of you already have Apple TV's. That means one software upgrade and BAM!, you got your iTV! Netflix doesn't have that seamless "hardware/software" advantage (an Apple hallmark). Of course Apple will place its new OTT video service front and center and give it to you for free (for several months). The user experience will be compelling. You will try it! And, then you will let your credit card auto-renew.
(4) Millions more will buy new Apple TV's. Heck, those crafty Cupertino-ians are practically giving them away now -- dropping the price to $69. That's just two weeks of Starbuck lattes! (And here's a tantalizing thought. What if Apple's New "Netflix killer" is just the app-e-teaser for the main event -- its launch of the long-anticipated all-in-one real iTV -- something about which I first wrote 5 years ago? 'Tis a real possibility. After all, Steve Jobs always called the current little Apple TV black box a "hobby." This could be time for the real thing).
(5) It will feature ESPN and HBO. This is the programming 1-2 punch. Apple TV already is alone with HBO's new stand-alone HBO Now service (a 90 day exclusive). And, Dish's Sling TV already cracked the code with ESPN, so the door is wide open for Apple so long as it pays just like the other Pay TV guys (which it absolutely will for ESPN, the most necessary programming ingredient). Netflix, of course, doesn't have either. (One more little detail -- don't forget that ESPN is owned by Disney, and Disney's Chairman & CEO Bob Iger sits on Apple's board.)
Apple's "Netflix killer" -- it came, we saw, they conquered!
Kamis, 24 Januari 2013
A Tale of Two Companies -- Netflix & Apple (and Their Quarterly Earnings)
It is the best of times -- and the worst of times -- for two digital media giants (well, one of the two towers over the other and all others, but they are both "giants" nonetheless in terms of mind-share in the tech world).
Good times for Netflix.
For Apple, not so much.
Both just reported quarterly earnings -- and Netflix surprised the Street (on the positive side), causing the company's shares to skyrocket 34% to $138 in after-hours trading! (Still well below previous highs of about $300 -- but, 34% is 34%).
Apple didn't exactly surprise -- but, it did "miss" Street expectations, sending its shares down significantly. Apple shares now trade around $500 (where not so long ago they traded at about $700). Many Apple investors -- including me -- are getting a bit nervous about how the massive ship (which now counts over $130 billion in cash assets) will steer itself into continued high growth amid the mounting competition in all product categories.
I have one answer. The long-rumored iTV -- which, if done right, could open up the whole world of your living room to Apple.
But, doing it "right" isn't easy. As I have written several times before, ultimately, it is about the content available on the iTV (and how compelling the overall hardware/software/content execution is from a U/X perspective). And, not only does the critical content not come cheap, it may not come at all to Apple (due to the wariness of significant interests who would not welcome the Apple challenge).
Given that downright sobering reality, Apple must "think different" about how to solve this dilemma.
I previously offered a solution -- buy Dish Networks (you can read my full analysis here).
Good times for Netflix.
For Apple, not so much.
Both just reported quarterly earnings -- and Netflix surprised the Street (on the positive side), causing the company's shares to skyrocket 34% to $138 in after-hours trading! (Still well below previous highs of about $300 -- but, 34% is 34%).
Apple didn't exactly surprise -- but, it did "miss" Street expectations, sending its shares down significantly. Apple shares now trade around $500 (where not so long ago they traded at about $700). Many Apple investors -- including me -- are getting a bit nervous about how the massive ship (which now counts over $130 billion in cash assets) will steer itself into continued high growth amid the mounting competition in all product categories.
I have one answer. The long-rumored iTV -- which, if done right, could open up the whole world of your living room to Apple.
But, doing it "right" isn't easy. As I have written several times before, ultimately, it is about the content available on the iTV (and how compelling the overall hardware/software/content execution is from a U/X perspective). And, not only does the critical content not come cheap, it may not come at all to Apple (due to the wariness of significant interests who would not welcome the Apple challenge).
Given that downright sobering reality, Apple must "think different" about how to solve this dilemma.
I previously offered a solution -- buy Dish Networks (you can read my full analysis here).
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)


